Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Bevis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tom Bevis[edit]
- Tom Bevis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Vanity biography. Searched google for "Thomas Bevis" and Worldcat for the books mentioned; no hits on either, or on the bands. phoebe / (talk to me) 04:34, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seriously, if there's no hits, and the guy's that young, there's unlikely to be any other serious media (books and such) covering him. Definitely non-notable. Tadakuni (talk) 06:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable - no ghits for him, his pen names, his books or most of his bands. —97198 (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete puffy, unsourced, and pretty obviously self-written vanity page of an extremely non-notable person. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.