Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TomTom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep. Solumeiras talk 20:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
TomTom[edit]
This article violates WP:CORP and WP:NPOV. It does not cite independent sources. This is pure commercial promotion. Iterator12n Talk 19:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Plenty of 3rd party sources available on this one. Content is mostly factual, the company, its products, and a brief mention of a major outage. No strong POV pushing. Some sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep -- while this article may lack adequate references, I recommend withdrawing this AfD:
- The article states that TomTom trades on the Euronext exchange. Normally companies that trade on a major exchange are considered inherently notable.
- A Google News searches >1800 press mentions in the last 30 days. Searching the Google News archives turns up 12,000 more press mentions
- Article histories never establish notability but they I note that this article's been edited over 170 times by several dozen different editors
- Keep It now has multiple non-trival reliable sources added to the article. From no sources to fully sourced in about 30 minutes :) spryde | talk 20:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 20:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.