Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tollet Street

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing based on early consensus. Missvain (talk) 23:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tollet Street[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about an unremarkable two-block long street in Greater London. I don't find anything other than directories mentioning the street. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As stated in the nomination, there's nothing notable or remarkable about this short street in London,and certainly no significant coverage in reliable sources to show it meets the general notability guideline. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There doesn't seem to be much to say about this street. What little there is doesn't justify a dedicated article and can easily be accommodated elsewhere if anybody feels the need. --DanielRigal (talk) 15:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A non notable street. Pilean (talk) 13:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There is nothing to suggest the street is notable. The fact that George Lusk lived there does not make it notable. Dunarc (talk) 16:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If this street is notable, million more be. If we keep this article, we will end up with half the articles on Wikipedia being about streets, and it will only be that low because keeping this article would force more broad inclusion criteria for everything else.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.