Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ToeJam and Earl 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ToeJam and Earl 1

Duplication of an already existing page (Toejam and Earl) with barely any info. Should not be redirected either, because the game's title does not include the "1". _ZXCVBNM 01:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to ToeJam & Earl. No meaningful content here. TJ Spyke 01:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Redirect~~Delete - to ToeJam and Earl--Tr uc o 01:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike (talk) 02:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant to ToeJam & Earl. I really don't think a redirect would make sense, as common sense dictates someone is not going to type a 1 after a game/movie/etc title (only exception I know is PlayStation 1, but Sony intentionally re-marketed it as such). MuZemike (talk) 02:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure, I think it's plausible. But I wouldn't be upset either way. TJ Spyke 03:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant and misnamed. JJL (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' Redundant, unlikely redirect. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant. Redirect should not be necessary. Basie (talk) 06:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.