Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Theodora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Theodora

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable routine career. The references are about his cases, not himself. Being involved in few cases involving notable people is not notability DGG ( talk ) 09:50, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Attorney notability is not inherited from clients (or else I would belong in the encyclopedia, which I'm sure I don't). There does not seem to be anything else remarkable about this subject. BD2412 T 21:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. I could not find significant coverage in reliable sources about the subject. W 42 17:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - coverage exists like William H. Ginsburg (another trial lawyer). This book covers him well. Maria Walbaum (talk) 15:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We judge notablity of an author by his books (critical reviews of his work, etc.), likewise a lawyer by the cases he won/lost. The cases he was part of already have pages about them. Maria Walbaum (talk) 15:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.