Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Dills
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Todd Dills (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Has published one book from a non-notable micro-press, Featherproof books, which is going down in flames on an AfD at this very moment. His book fails WP:BK and he fails WP:BIO Qworty (talk) 02:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Maybe we should have more restrictions on the number of articles new editors can create? Richard001 (talk) 03:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It may be that an article on Dills is better suited to narrower contexts, such as Bhamwiki. --Dystopos (talk) 04:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Gamaliel (talk) 17:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Darrenhusted (talk) 08:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - a couple of the other Featherproof press writers are, I think, worth keeping. However, with Todd Dills I couldn't really find enough to suggest that he's sufficiently notable. The best was probably the Chicago Tribune article, which was a full piece on him and his publication of The2ndHand journal. Other than that, there are a couple of reviews around of his book, but nothing that I was able to turn up in a significant publication, and some mentions of his book tour in The Washington Post, but they were essentially trivial. - Bilby (talk) 06:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.