Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobias Finch-Hatton, Viscount Maidstone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tobias Finch-Hatton, Viscount Maidstone[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable in his own right. He is a courtesy Viscount but there is no certainty that he will become an Earl and we should cross that bridge when we come to it. For now he doesn't seem notable (other than for who his father is) and I don't believe he passes WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 13:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I see some coverage in The Courier-Mail but it does not strike me as in-depth coverage. Surtsicna (talk) 14:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as for the Earl of Dalkeith Athel cb (talk) 09:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has a UK Who's Who entry https://doi.org/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U26330 Piecesofuk (talk) 15:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What does it say about him? Surtsicna (talk) 15:36, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- As mentioned elsewhere having a UK Who's Who entry is not one of WP's notability criteria. In this case his Who's Who entry simply reads "Born 21 June 1998; s and heir of Earl of Winchilsea and Nottingham, qv" - end of entry. Uhooep (talk) 15:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - That doesn't add up to notability for me Athel cb (talk) 16:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While the Who's Who mentioned above can be considered a reliable source in some cases, which is not the case for the other Who's Who, just being mentioned in a reliable source does not give notability. The actual guidelines calls for multiple, mentions in reliable sources that are significant. The mention of this person in Who's Who does not really meet the significant coverage requirement.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.