Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobey Bartee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:38, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tobey Bartee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All coverage is WP:ROUTINE and WP:MILL. Never held office so doesn't pass WP:NPOL and almost no coverage to begin with, so fails WP:GNG. Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 06:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 06:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 06:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NPOL as failed political candidate. Bkissin (talk) 20:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable failed political candidate.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being unsuccessful election candidates — but there's no claim here that he had preexisting notability for other reasons, and not nearly enough sourcing to make his candidacy a special case over and above all the other unsuccessful candidates who don't have and aren't getting Wikipedia articles for that. Bearcat (talk) 23:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.