Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ToKernel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Im sorry but recruiting a posse does not make a subject notable. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ToKernel[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A web application framework. No attempt made to show that it is notable. Sgroupace (talk) 20:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is Article about PHP Framework which is released at 04/12/2011. The website of the project is http://tokernel.com David Ayvazyan (talk) 21:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely unnotable and unreferenced. Wikipedian2 (talk) 22:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence the subject meets the notability criterion for a standalone article. Please see Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability. -- Rrburke (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you Please help us to Improve this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.70.26.125 (talk) 07:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article referenced to another, similar articles by category and contains external links which assume that this project is notable. Also, there are writen about the word 'tokernel' - toKernel is the concatenation of the words 'to kernel', which is the project and/or product name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Ayvazyan (talk • contribs) 08:07, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

— David Ayvazyan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Keep This article references a PHP framework released only a few days ago, which may not yet be considered as notable but should pick up rapidly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.88.67.37 (talk) 15:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We believe that this article might just as well stay in Wikipedia, because "toKernel" is free software and have all the necessary functions for the Web application frameworks. We investigated this 'toKernel' software project and we found it as useful and correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KhArshak (talk • contribs) 03:44, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

— KhArshak (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Keep This framework is familiar to me! I downloaded it and saw that it's really good! It's very convenient to work with this framework! Waiting for updates! P.S. I think this article about "toKernel" has a place in wikipedia! It's gonna beсome famous very soon! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rartlib (talk • contribs) 11:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

— Rartlib (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Comment- at least two 'Keep' votes above are from editors with no contributions to wikipedia other than this deletion discussion. Dialectric (talk) 04:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So tagged. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There isn't enough coverage of this framework in reliable sources to support an article. That may change - I hope so, it seems to have some potential - but until it does, we don't have an article. Usual caveats apply; when the software is broadly used and reviewed, then we write the article - not before. If all goes well, maybe that'll be sooner rather than later, or maybe not. But it's not there right now, and that's what we evaluate here. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.