Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tjaša Iris (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Tjaša Iris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recreation of an article deleted in 2008; should be reviewed whether it meets the notability guidelines now. Eleassar my talk 11:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep GNG sources in the press. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 09:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I agree, passes GNG! SarahStierch (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep ...not sure why she's described as "emerging". Judging by the published sources listed at the bottom of the article she has emerged, particularly subsequent to 2008. All the same, clean-up is very much needed because of the uncited claims and non-encyclopedic language. Sionk (talk) 02:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.