Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tits of Death
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RFerreira (talk) 21:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tits of Death (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable. Label is redlinked. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 17:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 17:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Shouldn't they be a pair instead of a quintet? No, seriously, Weak delete for now. The sources are borderline, but I don't think they quite cut it yet. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Chirps•Clams•Chowder) 17:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Of marginal notability, but the references put them over the line. Gotta love that band name, though. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. I would say they juuuuuuuuust barely meet WP:MUSIC criteria #1. They're really pretty borderline, but I've got a funny feeling about them...um...that they'll garner more notability, I mean. --UsaSatsui (talk) 19:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, discussion in multiple WP:V/WP:RS secondary sources. Cirt (talk) 21:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. 'Non Notable' is a rather unspecific argument. If something is redlinked it just means there isn't an article about it on Wikipedia and nothing else. Sufficient coverage for WP to have an article.--Michig (talk) 17:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ...and there's more coverage out there: [1], [2], [3].--Michig (talk) 17:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- More coverage? Awwwww...oh, that kind of coverage? nevermind. --UsaSatsui (talk) 20:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.