Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Chancey
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Cbrown1023 talk 19:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion or evidence of notability whatsoever, other than a tenuous "was in a band with a guy from Deep Purple" which would be better suited to that band's entry. However, seeing that as it's been up a year with multiple editors, bringing it here instead of speedying or merging. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 18:19, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've heard of her a number of times in the "early music" world, won't say keep or delete yet, let me do a little digging, though. Mak (talk) 19:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The early music world is understated in the Wkikipedia and Tina Chancey is well know in this field. I feel the comment about her being in the band with a guy from Deep Purple is both potentally insulting to her and to Ritchie Blackmore who is that guy. I would hope that the comment is not coming from the point of view of a Deep Purple fan which I happen to be but from someone who is trying to be both constructive and extending the entry on Tina Chancey. I am looking for her academic details as she is an academic working in the field of music that she is credited for here. I think a look at the Hesperus website would provide us useful information which will allow us to keep this entry. At this time I object to deletion. Paulw99 20:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- "I feel the comment about her being in the band with a guy from Deep Purple is both potentally insulting to her and to Ritchie Blackmore who is that guy" - what? She was in a band with a guy from Deep Purple. It's not a value judgement! - iridescenti (talk to me!) 20:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You totally miss the fact that she was in her own right able to achieve two National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) awards for which you have to be of a extremely high standard as a musician. To have picked up on her performing with Ritchie Blackmore seems to be a little like a lack of other reason to object. I didn't mean to be insulting to you, I am sorry if that came accross that way, but she has done much more than that. I still object to deletion can we please look at giving me sometime to research more imformation on her and make this entry up to the standard required?. Paulw99 20:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment So far I have added an additional discography section and will be adding further information. Will someone comment on the additions please? I am also preparing a section on her academic work and the papers she has written but these are proving a little harder to understand as I don't have a doctorate in musicology.Paulw99 09:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl (talk) 08:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep She appears notable after following her ghits, but it's a stretch to say National Endowment for the Arts and extremely high standards are a given.--killing sparrows 00:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've expanded and cited the article a bit since this nomination. I think she's probably more notable for her work with Hesperus, which is a pretty successful early music group, as well as with other artists. Also note that her stage-name is "Tudor Rose" in that band with that guy from Deep Purple. Passes WP:music pretty clearly. Mak (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On doing more research on Tina Chancey I am beginning to find evidence of her academic work and her work as an editor of book reviews on the subject of music for a Society magazine related to her work. Unfortutanately this research is slow due to me not holding access or experience on where to find Tina's academic work. Living in the UK I am finding it hard to follow the routes to access academic papers in the USA.Paulw99 21:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I also challenge the comment made about the National Endowment Fund for the Arts Tina recieved twice, there are clear and high standards you have to achieve to be awarded funds from the NEA and their are clearly stated in their website.Paulw99 21:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete nn. Mukadderat 17:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Although I nominated this I think it now warrants a weak keep following the expanding - although that new discography reads like an advert - iridescenti (talk to me!) 17:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.