Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tin whip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 23:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tin whip

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:MADEUP. Author contested prod. OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 22:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 22:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my original prod nomination, which was to cite WP:MADEUP. -- role^player 22:36, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Been awhile since we've seen a made-up game article. In this one, people use a towel to knock down tin cans. "It is imperative that the rules are read before hand to avoid any potential injuries that can arise from this bloody sport." Even more imperative is to not use Wikipedia for a how-to on something that potentially causes injuries. Mandsford 00:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was unable to find any reliable sources discussing this game, although after reading the article, I didn't expect to. The game is made up as is its fictitious "international federation" and is accordingly, non-notable. Cullen328 (talk) 02:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tin Deleted -- This didn't qualify for a speedy? LonelyBeacon (talk) 02:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Under which criteria? -- role^player 15:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Polyamorph (talk) 18:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.