Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Judd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 17:49, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Judd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Makes claims of notability, but I'm unconvinced that this individual has enough notability outside a single event (naming the mockup space shuttle Independence) to warrant an article. Huntster (t @ c) 20:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The individual does have notability beyond a single event. In addition to naming a shuttle, he has made further contributions to both the space and science industry and the entertainment industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yourbamf (talkcontribs) 21:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:37, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:37, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:37, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been improved to meet the "notability beyond a single event" requirement. Please advise on how to further enhance it. Thanks.Yourbamf (talk) 00:59, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can the relister provide a short explanation as to why this article has been relisted? Still not sure what the article is lacking and why it is still being considered for deletion... Thanks, Yourbamf (talk) 23:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 23:00, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.