Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Coté

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I don't believe the nom has given any reasoning for the opening of this deletion discussion. For that reason, I'm going to close it as Keep rather than relist. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 00:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Coté

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Rockstar85* (talk) 17:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROMOTION

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Keep No real reason for deletion presented, and a literal drive-by nomination as nom's only edits have been to post this nomination. No prejudice to a re-nomination if an actual reasoning is presented. Nate • (chatter) 05:54, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.