Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timespace (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:44, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timespace (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The film does not meet the notability requirements Wikipedia:Notability (films). Diannaa (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 13:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since I cannot find any secondary sources about this film to indicate its possible notability. If others can find sources in their own investigations, I'd be happy to revise my stance. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 13:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and is purely WP:SELFPROMOTION at the moment. Should things change in the future it can be resurrected. MarnetteD|Talk 15:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Examiner.com is on the en.wikipedia spam blacklist, for justifiable reasons (rebundled, sometimes plagiarized content, with minimal editorial control), although the review the article mentions was actually written for the site. Nevertheless, even if we accept their review as a reliable, third-party source, that's the only one that I can locate, which falls short of our inclusion standards. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This was clearly written by an insider who didn't feel like adding sources for anything. HalloweenNight (talk) 16:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alts:

filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

actor:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

theme:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete It exists and can be watched, and while not a terrible film it has not gained commentary and analysis in reliable sources. WP:NF is failed. If sources come forward in the future, a resurrection can be considered. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 04:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.