Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time 106.8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Time 106.8[edit]

Is this A7? TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 01:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, no, I do not think so. Generally, radio stations are notable. I haven't seen one that wasn't. (|-- UlTiMuS 01:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

^{[Check Google hits]} is a bit disappointing, but most of them are completely unique. Against A3 deletion because there is room for expansion. (|-- UlTiMuS 02:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, feel free to add content then, but db-empty is db-empty. Aplomado ^talk 02:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. It looks like A3 to me. Aplomado ^talk 01:57, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete now that it actually has content. I don't think the simple existence of a radio station warrants an article, however, and this article really doesn't assert any notability. Aplomado ^talk 17:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - some content there now (although it could have been A3 before, it was never A7 as that applies only to people and groups). Yomangani ^talk 11:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are plenty of radio stations on here, right? StevenBao ^(talk) 16:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, consensus appears that radio staions are notable. Nuttah68 20:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.