Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time4learning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 12:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Time4learning

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much substantial converage. Non-notable company. Mooonswimmer 14:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 15:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quite a bit of external coverage, being used by over 175,000 students as per source, and clearly receiving attention. I would claim the website definitely passes notability. Spiralwidget (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Four of the citations are passing mentions of the company as a source of a minor statistic or claim. The best source is the Florida Trend item, which is three very short paragraphs that read like a press release. Not enough coverage to establish notability. - Donald Albury 17:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete some minor coverage, nothing here that meets WP:CORPDEPTH.-KH-1 (talk) 06:46, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.