Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TimberTech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TimberTech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

insufficient sources for notability , . The refs are press releases and consumer complaints. DGG ( talk ) 18:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing actually suggesting any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 20:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 22:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: My searches turned up one newspaper piece about the firm, which I have added as a reference, but that was local coverage. Other than that, I am seeing only PR-based announcements, though in substantial quantity. The firm and its products do seem to have a fair number of international outlets, which saved the article from speedy-deletion at outset, but I am seeing nothing to meet WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. (If this article does survive AfD, it is questionable whether its Potential Lawsuit section should remain, unless there is evidence that it became a reality.) AllyD (talk) 18:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Apart from the one local coverage, I found a trivial mention in NYtimes where it says The leading makers of these decks are Trex and TimberTech,. However, there are no other reliable sources which I can use for significant coverage about this company. I'm not convinced that it requires an article at this moment. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.