Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim oconnor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 14:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tim oconnor[edit]

Same non-notable "professional" skateboarder, different article name. Ugh. Cyde Weys 14:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not even an assertion of notability. Vanity or attack, depending on how the subject views the anecdote related.--MayerG 16:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable vanity. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 17:04, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this nn. So nn that even no sockpuppet votes? feydey 01:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Aren't all professional athletes notable? What is this bias against skateboarding?! Skateboarding is not a crime! Just kidding, delete. (Although I do think there's a case to be made for tightening the current criteria for including athletes.) - squibix (talk) 14:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 20:17, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to have been deleted early by Drini. Curious. I suspect it would qualify for G4 speedy anyway so I'm not bothered to DRV it, although I would have been inclined to vote keep per WP:CSB. Stifle 18:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.