Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Truman (Sunset Beach)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Significant improvement by Raintheone. (Before diff After diff, per WP:HEY). (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 04:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Truman (Sunset Beach)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character. Article is not written in an encyclopedic tone, and does not cite any sources. Seacactus 13 (talk) 20:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:21, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:12, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Wikipedia is not a fan Wiki.TH1980 (talk) 01:17, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article is much improved now.TH1980 (talk) 00:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep Delete - seems from my searches that the subject does not meet WP:GNG. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC) Changing as per Piotrus; this is not the article it was before - in a good way. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In regards to the two main reasons in the nomination. I removed all of the unsourced content consisting mainly of in-universe plot summary. I have started to add sourced content.Rain the 1 22:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But have you found evidence that this character meets the notability guidelines? Still seems to be a stretch as a somewhat minor character from an old soap opera. Seacactus 13 (talk) 03:59, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. After improvements made by Raintheone, subject satisfies GNG with in-depth coverage in numerous reliable sources. – DarkGlow • 21:43, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge to appropriate character list. Article now has secondary, reliable sources. - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:14, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep since this has been totally rewritten by Raintheone. The discussion should be restarted from zero, given we now have a totally new article than the one that was nominated (assuming anyone wants to restart it). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TH1980 and BennyOnTheLoose: who voted keep presumably before the rewrite was carried out. You may want to take a second look at this now. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.