Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Storey (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:50, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Storey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the article's second nomination for deletion. The first nomination in 2007 was successful and the article was deleted. It has since returned. It meets the following criteria:

WP:N The subject is not known outside of his life coaching classes.
WP:V The claims in the article are not verifiable, and the article itself contains maintenance tags over 2 years old for lack of verification.
WP:RS The references given are to his own website, to Random House (for a list of his products) and a write up on CBN
WP:NOT Wikipedia is not for self promotion.
- WP:PROMO The article appears to promote the individuals books, as they are prominently listed in the article. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 21:29, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 21:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 21:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 21:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 21:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 21:51, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Meets the spirit, if not the letter, of WP:G4. James (^talk/_contribs) 23:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- nn as either "life coach, self-help author, motivational speaker, or entrepreneur" -- just promo cruft. Possibly salt as well. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not sure I have ever seen an article that violated so many Wikipedia policies.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.