Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Phillips (businessman)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There was some talk during the double-length discussion about additional sources that would supply notability, but the only source that ended up being added was a trivial listing of the top five brokerage firms in his local area, the fifth of which was his. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tim Phillips (businessman)[edit]
- Tim Phillips (businessman) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Does not appear to be sufficiently notable. • Lawrence Cohen 23:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have looked and can't find an article of the company that this person leads, so I think this person is definitely not notable. Captain panda 03:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep I can't find news articles, but there are a number of websites about his candidacy for the House of Representatives. I believe the subject is somewhat notable. --- FrankTobia (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Which sites? I didn't notice these before. We need to check if they qualify as reliable sources, but that could definitely play a role if we can review them. • Lawrence Cohen 21:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Hi folks, I created the article. There are indeed a number of websites about the candidacy and his work in the community. He is a regular political correspondent on local news stations and owns one of the largest investment firms in Oregon. I believe the CEO category is a fitting spot for a page on him. I will add more links to the page and look for more. Sturatt (talk) 00:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 10:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- This is nothing more than a resumè.---Iconoclast Horizon 12:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconoclast.horizon (talk • contribs)
- Delete not suff. notable Victuallers (talk) 14:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.