Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Mynett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:35, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Mynett

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Classic failure of WP:BIO1E. He's alleged to have had an affair with Ilhan Omar, which is the sole reason he could conceivably be considered notable. It's means this is more of an attack page than legitimate biography. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:15, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:15, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree ~~and suggestion~~. I agree with your statement. Before you nominated this article for deletion, User:Muboshgu, I inserted a "see also" in Ilhan Omar's article here. I think this information should be moved to Omar's article if Mynett's article is deleted. But the number of references trimmed to the best major national outlets, as I mentioned at Talk:Tim_Mynett.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
CaroleHenson, it was your edit summary, which I saw on my watchlist, that alerted me to this article existing. I oppose merging this content to Omar's article. It's only an allegation. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:32, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, per you and Pokerplayer. Struck out "and suggestion".–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Agree and I think info regarding the divorce can be merged, but the FEC complaint should be left out because WP:NOTNEWS. Cheers, Pokerplayer513 (talk) 21:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Adding Juno to this since they created the page. - Pokerplayer513 (talk) 22:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pokerplayer513, the page creator was already notified. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:04, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination since subject fails WP:NPERSON, being only and momentarily semi-famous for one fling, uhh thing. -The Gnome (talk) 08:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Alleged" fling. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:45, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability is not inherited, so people do not qualify to have Wikipedia articles just because they're alleged to have had an extramarital affair with somebody else who does have a Wikipedia article. But this makes no other claim that he's notable for other reasons independently of who he allegedly boinked, and the fact that you can jengastack a giant cluster reference bomb of nine or ten separate citations onto one sentence, verifying and reverifying and rereverifying that fact while adding nothing new, is not a notability booster. This is a classic WP:BLP1E. Bearcat (talk) 15:32, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.