Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Lamont

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:49, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Lamont (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While accomplished, there is not enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass GNG, and his positions, h-Index, and anemic quotation count do not show that he passes WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 TT me 14:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agreed, it's a bit too early in their career for notability here; can perhaps revisit in 5-10 yrs. It appears this is a beefed-up LinkedIn posting. Oaktree b (talk) 15:53, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.