Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Krieger
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep/ closed by nominator. I didn't think that a state legislator qualified as first level sub-national office (for some reason I was only equating Governor to that.... silly me) and as the article originally stood I didn't see extra anything qualifying as notable. Great job on the rewrite and the added sources. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 21:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tim Krieger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
NN state rep, fails WP:POLITICIAN. Google comes up with nothing except his contact info on the PA house of representatives website. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 17:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. In my opinion he seems to meet WP:POLITICIAN, specifically as a member of the Pennsylvania legislature he holds a first-level sub-national political office and so meets the first criteria - "People who have held international, national or first-level sub-national political office, including members of a legislature and judges". Most memebrs of the PA house of representatives have articles and although this article is only a stub that's no reason to delete. Dpmuk (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect he meets WP:POLITICIAN, but this substub is so devoid of information that it is more a directory entry than a biography. Does anyone know when or where he was born, which party he's in? Well our article doesn't help them either. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Just did a major update so it now provides a lot more information (although, annoyingly, not where and when he was born as I ahven't found this yet). Dpmuk (talk) 18:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the rewrite. Still would like to know when & where he was born, but alas the information is probably a state secret. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just did a major update so it now provides a lot more information (although, annoyingly, not where and when he was born as I ahven't found this yet). Dpmuk (talk) 18:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as state level politician. Well done to Dpmuk for the rewrite. Capitalistroadster (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.