Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Burns (actor, born 1977)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Burns (actor, born 1977)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Someone has really been making a lot of articles related to the now deleted for failing GNG director Timothy Spanos. Here is another. I believe this actor fails WP:GNG. SarahStierch (talk) 16:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per TOO SOON. Yes, WP:GNG is failed, but when it is, we look further in the notability guidelines. While this actor's roles can pretty much be verified, no independent sources have taken note of he or his work. As we have no verifiability that his roles are significant to his projects, and even though there are many, he fails notability guidelines for actors. Maybe when reliable sources take notice, we can too. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 21:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject's body of work does not justify a separate article according to sources. More independent sources or new work may improve notability. --Stormbay (talk) 21:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He is verifiably a working actor, but not one that meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. No prejudice to recreation if his future work garners notice. -- Whpq (talk) 14:28, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.