Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bays
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Tim Bays (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete: insufficiently notable academic/educator. Quis separabit? 23:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete seems to fail WP:ACADEMIC, WP:N and WP:GNG at this stage of his career.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 23:17, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. apparently not yet notable DGG ( talk ) 09:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.