Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Armstrong band
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tim Armstrong band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. An article on a non notable covers band which makes no claim to meeting WP:BAND. A search returns no reliable sources Nuttah (talk) 09:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable covers band, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Poss conflict of interest from the creator too. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 10:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN covers band. Before I RTFA, I thought this might have something to do with Tim Armstrong, the singer for Rancid, but this is a different NN Tim Armstrong. Article does not establish notability and fails WP:MUSIC. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. dramatic (talk) 22:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Needs more sourcing, and I think that the best references will be found offline (I'm in the wrong part of the country for that). Longevity and recording output both point to notability (info needed on which labels etc.) Multiple references for them playing originals as well as covers. dramatic (talk) 22:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: non-notable covers band, as per WP:MUSIC. JamesBurns (talk) 05:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.