Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tillman Morgan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tillman Morgan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Innkeeper whose notability is not established. In contesting the prod, the creator did assert notability - that of the town this person works in. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 04:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Sources as below. They're not much but they're enough to satisfy WP:N and notability in a local context is still notability:
- - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete an obituary in the local paper is not the significant coverage in independent reliable sources required for notability. Nuttah (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Is that a personal opinion, or do you have a reference to policy to support that assertion? - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @663 · 14:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not reach my standards of notability (for all that's worth). Generally agree that a single obit in local paper is not significant. However, if within that obit something really notable is listed (e.g., was a crew member on the Enola Gay) I might think differently. In this individual's case, the most notable thing in the obituary to me was that "He remembered Albert Einstein watching his platoon practicing military drills". I also went ahead and deleted what I considered a spam link to his real-estate agency(?) which was suffixed to the wikipedia article (can I do that if I'm weighing in on an AfD here?). -Quartermaster (talk) 15:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.