Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tigirlily

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus does not preclude userfication if someone requests that. joe deckertalk 00:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tigirlily[edit]

Tigirlily (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a band which is possibly up-and-coming, but not notable at this time. Provided references were a couple of local news articles, and I found nothing better. A7 speedy nomination was declined. --Finngall talk 20:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk 20:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk 20:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy. This band seems like they are on the brink of notability, and that way the creator can add references as they become available and then move the article to mainspace when it meets the guidelines for inclusion. White Arabian Filly Neigh 15:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and then Userfy if needed, none of this is solidly better convincing of keeping and improving with the needed notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Outside of a few minor local interest pieces they lack coverage in independent reliable sources. Note that the deceptively claimed billboard charting is regional not national. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.