Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tigam Alif Farisma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 21:59, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tigam Alif Farisma

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus is now clear that passing WP:GNG is far, far more important than playing as little as 26 mins of professional football over 7 years ago and not playing since. Indonesian search came back with nothing of note. Searching across other search engines, the only thing I can find is an image caption in Tribun News and some database sites like Tribuna and Footballdatabase.eu, which never confer notability on their own. Honestly, that was all I could find. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 09:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:23, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons noted by GiantSnowman. Common sense would say that a brief runout several years ago and no evidence of anything since, nor any remote claim to being notable, suggests that WP:GNG is not met. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.