Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany J. Curtis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:45, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tiffany J. Curtis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to establish notability, per WP:NACTOR. Grayfell (talk) 05:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (confer) @ 12:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (gab) @ 12:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG, she has had very few roles and nothing that can be considered an independant reliable source comes up in Google. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:27, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 00:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

aka:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. She's had some film roles, but none of them seems to have been important enough to catch any media attention. Fails WP:GNG. And without the roles being determinable as significant to these productions, we have a failure of WP:ENT. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.