Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiens Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:11, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tiens Group[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Did not receive significant coverage from reliable sources. No indication of notability. Most of the article sounds promotional in nature. Fails WP:COMPANY. Luftfall (talk) 05:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Nominated related article, Li Jinyuan (businessman) for deletion. Luftfall (talk) 05:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:52, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The holiday excursion got global coverage and it's easy to find more such as this FT case study. Note also that the article contains talk of fraud and so the suggestion that the article is promotional is nonsense. Andrew D. (talk) 07:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's a single section of the article talking about fraud. I still stand by the statement that most of the article is promotional. Luftfall (talk) 07:13, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A quick look in Google Books yields many hits - [1][2][3][4], should qualify under WP:NCORP. I don't know why such a large corporation with significant international presence should be submitted for AfD. Hzh (talk) 19:10, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep References exist that meet the criteria for establishing notability, meets NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:44, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - between the holiday sources here and elsewhere (some of which actually discuss the company in some detail) and the sources above on the company and its strategy itself I feel that NCORP is satisfied. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.