Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiberium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tiberium[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Purely fancruft content - is already on the Command and Conquer Wikia which is where it is better suited to be. At most it merits a small mention in Command & Conquer, but does not demonstrate any notability on its own. A search in the WP:VG search engine mainly comes up with mentions of the cancelled game of the same name. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep central element of a hugely popular game series that's been covered substantially in reliable independemt sources such as here. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- That is an article by the game's executive producer Mike Verdu, therefore it's a WP:PRIMARY source, there needs to be a number of secondary sources for it to actually be notable._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ITSPOPULAR is not an argument. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 16:07, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Long description of an in-universe element, no additional or actual coverage. The "concept" section has a huge chunk on how the element functions in-game. Trivial, and the sources provided do not discuss Tiberium itself, but how it functions in-game. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of significant independent commentary on the subject. There is a lot of good content in the article, but not of the sort appropriate to Wikipedia, and since it's already on the C&C wikia we have no need to worry on that front.--Martin IIIa (talk) 16:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.