Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunderpop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G7) by PhilKnight. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thunderpop[edit]

This is a page about a term only used by a member of a single obscure band to describe his own music. This has no notability as a genre of music from reliable sources. WesleyDodds (talk) 10:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NEO & WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 11:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My google search seemed to confirm WesleyDodds's objection. Fletcher (talk) 13:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WesleyDodds, Esradekan, and Fletcher. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 13:19, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. Happyme22 (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – A search through Google News archives, as well as a search through a library database of newspaper and magazine articles, turns up no sources. Notability per WP:N is not established. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.