Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunderdome (drinking game) (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced and Non-notable drinking game. A completely different version was previously deleted for this reason: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunderdome (drinking game). Since the article was entirely different than the last one, I figured this deserves another AfD look. Mangojuicetalk 01:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unsourced, not notable. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm saying delete under WP:NOT instruction guides. If this game has got enough attention to warrant notability, it should at least have some info about the game outside the rules. Currently, it doesn't. If information about about it's history, founder, or anything encyclopedia shows up then it should stay. Mitaphane talk 02:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Vectro 02:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not for made up drinking games without verification.-- danntm T C 03:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Three Man. The two articles have similiar game rules. Arbusto 05:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It sounds like a fun drinking game, but unless any sources turn up it doesn't belong here. - Lex 08:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Every drinking game was made up at some point, so why are others okay that is the worst logic ever if the others can stay this one should too. Besides it seems like it would be a good time to play with friends. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.46.192.201 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - Our complaints have to do with the fact that there are no sources on this game. Other drinking games have sources to make their articles encyclopedic. - Lex 19:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I might even try this game, but that doesn't mean that it belongs here. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 16:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Maelnuneb Khukri (talk . contribs) 20:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per WP:NOT NauticaShades 20:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The following is a list of drinking games with no sources (almost 30% of all the games in the "drinking game" category):
Smashy Canny, 21 (drinking game), Arrogance (game), Avalanche (drinking game), Bullshit (drinking game), Card blowing, Circle of Death (drinking game), Crazy 8's, Disassociation/Association, Drink while you think, Fuzzy Duck, Hi-Lo, Horserace (drinking game), Land Mine, Matchboxes, Ride the Bus, Ring of Fire (drinking game), Roman Numerals (game), Spoof (game), Ten Minute Warning (drinking game), Three Man, Up the river, down the river
That’s just including the ones with no mention of history, references or any external links. I may have added more information before uploading this page, but it seemed as though the information on the Thunderdome page was comparable to other pages.
A history of Thunderdome will be added shortly. Drinkgame 21:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You may be right that those other articles should also be deleted. But just because they haven't been deleted yet doesn't mean we shouldn't delete this one. Mangojuicetalk 01:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.