Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thugstep (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. kurykh 09:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Thugstep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A non-notable musical subgenre. Google turns up a load of "dj nappy" and Urban Dictionary references, but nothing reliable. Ironholds (talk) 00:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC) Ironholds (talk) 00:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that Thugstep is very noticeable genre, and google gives many hits on thugstep and nintendub. I think the page about thugstep should not be removed. And nintendub was noticed in FactMagazine.
- From myspace-then delete.--Freeway8 00:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No reliable sources to suggest that it's notable. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 01:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Nothing has changed since the previous AFD - see my arguments there. Wickethewok (talk) 03:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete still no reliable sources for the sub-genre. SkierRMH (talk) 07:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete still no sub-genre for the reliable sources. - Jimmi Hugh (talk) 08:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nothing has changed since the last AfD except that this editor has become really disruptive with edit-warring at electronic music articles. --Kaini (talk) 17:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.