Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Through the Years (Gary Glitter song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gary Glitter discography. MBisanz talk 01:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Through the Years (Gary Glitter song)[edit]

Through the Years (Gary Glitter song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable song. Unreferenced since October 2006. The IP user 82.45.239.158 reverted the redirection to Gary Glitter by Mattg82. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The article states it charted, so does that meet notability? I'm not familar with the music charts standard. If that doesn't meet the notability, then delete as an unlikely search term for a n/n entry. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:40, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect. It did chart, but only at #49 which is a low showing. There is little to say about it, so a redirect is the common outcome if there isn't much to say about the song. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 07:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete In the UK it is generally accepted that the Top 40 is the relevant chart so in order to be notable for its position, it needs to be in that. This does not qualify. KaisaL (talk) 11:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.