Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Through the Looking Glass (Lost) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was trolling.. - auburnpilot talk 01:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Through the Looking Glass (Lost)

Wikipedia is not a collection of plot summaries. Another issue is notability--Makesbasis (talk) 01:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the references section clearly demonstrates notability. Marlith (Talk) 05:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I wonder what new people who are visiting Wikipedia for the first time will think of seeing this AfD tag on the first article they see. Marlith (Talk) 05:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Bad faith nomination, especially considering the article is a main page FA today. Lovelac 7 05:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep yeah obviously...too bad it got nominated...--DatDoo (talk) 05:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep this is an absurd nomination. If this is deleted there are literally thousands of other articles which would have to be deleted as well. - Atarr (talk) 05:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article gives information on production, reception, and over a hundred references. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 05:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - Methinks thy saber be a bit pointy. --jonny-m t 06:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.