Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrissivaperoor Kliptham
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdraw. I will look closer. I didn't see anything of interest the first time, but I don't have time right now to look closer, so taking it on faith. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:33, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thrissivaperoor Kliptham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:CRYSTAL, doesn't seem to meet criteria for inclusion. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 17:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: @Dennis Brown: the film was already released. Jim Carter 17:49, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 17:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- The phase "will be" is used a lot in that article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Dennis Brown: Hi, did you checked the subject on the web before nominating it here? Since you reasoned WP:CRYSTAL for the deletion, I get an idea that you might haven't checked it on the web; nominated purely based on what the article said. Jim Carter 19:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- The phase "will be" is used a lot in that article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.