Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threeleaper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fairy chess piece#Leapers. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Threeleaper

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded this five years ago with the concern "All sourcing tied to The Chess Variant Pages, which appears to be an indiscriminate collection of variant chess pieces and provides no evidence of notability. Internet searches suggest that alternative sources do not exist." It was unprodded by Double sharp, asking to "to wait a bit for Ihardlythinkso's stores of material". The subsequent five years have seen a total of three non-substantive edits to the article, and more recent internet searches do not reveal any further reliable sources. Redirecting to fairy chess could be considered. JBL (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. JBL (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

merge with Fairy chess piece as a piece used in fairy chess, it should fit in the pieces segment -just a quick reminder,Im really bad at this(talk)- 15:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC) comment this is the second fairy chess piece page considered for deletion today, is something going on? should we delete the other fairy chess piece pages? -just a quick reminder,Im really bad at this(talk)- 15:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your comment: what is going on is that something popped up on my watchlist which caused me to look through the history of some articles I had edited 5 years ago, and to notice the circumstances described in the nominations. Probably there are some other fairy chess articles that are reasonable candidates for deletion and some that are not. --JBL (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Fairy_chess_piece#Leapers per WP:ATD.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above.TheLongTone (talk) 17:00, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.