Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three for me

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:00, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three for me[edit]

Non-notable card game - invented a few weeks ago. Cnwb 06:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's the criteria for card games, national level tournament? Whatever it is, delete until then. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 06:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete until at least 5000 people know how to play this game. Dbtfz 06:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable,unverifiable. All the Google hits I looked at were not relevant. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-16 06:42Z
Delete per nom -- Astrokey44|talk 14:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Bachrach44 03:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete neocardgame-ism (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do not Delete There is a typo. The game was created January 1, 2004. At LEAST 5000 people know about this game. The game was learned about and spread through a local school card tournament. The game was played through a series of eliminations. 300 people took part in the game with at least 1000 surveyours, and even more people who knw the game and rules. This should be notable enough to not be deleted. I can include the history of the game once it is off the deletion list.Tifroc
- I think it would make more sense to write a history of the game before it's off the deletion list. Cnwb 03:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.