Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrash Anthems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thrash Anthems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. As with Thash Anthems II, I favour redirecting to the relevant discographt; I intended to nominate this at the same time as Thrah anthems II but fouled up. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrash Anthems II. TheLongTone (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As I mentioned in the prior discussion, Thrash Anthems and Thrash Anthems II are entirely different situations. II had virtually zero sources outside of one announcing its existence. Not the case with the original, released 10 years prior, at all.

Lengthy AllMusic review.
Exclaim review.
Blabbermouth review.
Metal Hammer/Team Rock review.
Metal Injection review.
Rock Hard review (A long-running German print magazine - Rock Hard (magazine).)

Sources are reliable per WP:MUSIC/SOURCES, and are detailed and dedicated to the release. Meets the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 15:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Multiple in-depth reviews in reliable sources meet WP:NALBUM #1. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:55, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.