Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoughtspeak
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thoughtspeak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) It's about a band that appears to only be a local one. The article doesn't assert the notability for the subject, per WP:Music, so I think this probably ought to be deleted. JamieS93 21:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Completing nomination for User:JamieS93. A tenuous claim to notability keeps this band from an A7 speedy, but nowhere near meeting WP:NMG. Delete. Stifle (talk) 21:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not notable. Short, uninformative, unreferenced article and Google shows little apart from a MySpace page. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dustitalk to me 18:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No indication of notability, one recent album, no awards, no significant coverage. [1]. Fails WP:MUSIC. Wisdom89 (T / C) 20:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 20:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 20:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Should have been given a CSD A7 in the first place. archanamiya · talk 20:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BAND, probably should have been speedied. The Dominator (talk) 21:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of reliable references/notability. Luksuh 03:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, lack of reliable sources demonstating that this group meets the notability inclusion guideline for WP:bands and musicians. Suggest redirect to telepathy as a phrase used in some fictinoal works to describe telepathic communication (Animorphs is one I think of off the top of my head]]). -- saberwyn 05:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, agree that it should have been speedy deleted per CSD A7. --Bardin (talk) 14:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.