Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thought of Thomas Aquinas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Please continue merging discussion on the associated talk pages. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:14, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thought of Thomas Aquinas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has sufficiently been incorporated into the page on Thomism, and thus is now superfluous. The original author of the Thought of Thomas Aquinas article has agreed with me on this point, and now I'm just awaiting commentary. -- LightSpectra (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down a bit. I've just searched Thomism for the section headings currently in Thought of Thomas Aquinas, namely "Social justice", "Death penalty", "Heretics", "Usury", "Forced baptism" and "Existentialism". None of them is mentioned. This seems to me to undermine the claim that "This article has sufficiently been incorporated", don't you think? SamuelTheGhost (talk) 19:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thought of Thought of Thomas Aquinas, thought better of it. I agree with Sam the Ghost that there needs to be some time to make sure that relevant parts of this essay are, indeed, sufficiently incorporated elsewhere. Generally, these debates go on for a week. Thus, with some time, merge to Thomism with the redirect that follows. Mandsford (talk) 14:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Is there anyone who actually objects to merging this article to Thomism? AfD doesn't have to sign off on merges, and it's not really the best place to ask for feedback on an attempted merge. Asking at Talk:Thomas Aquinas and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy would probably be more helpful. --Chris Johnson (talk) 17:16, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - if the content has been merged, then it should remain a redirect, not deleted. See Wikipedia:Delete and merge.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail ^Review 01:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination calls for merge, and there is no serious call for deletion. As such, this AfD should be closed, and discussion continued at the talk page of the target, Talk:Thomism. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.