Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoth (video game)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thoth (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. It has (allegedly ) only been released a few days - not nearly enough to gather any notability. No refs at all. Fails WP:GNG. If there was a suitable category this would qualify for speedy deletion Velella Velella Talk 19:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - I've gone through and found some sources for this to establish at least a baseline notability. — foxj 20:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC).·
Keep: per above by first vote.--Blaze8724 (talk) 23:10, 16 October 2016 (UTC)User is part of an advertising-only account rampage. SwisterTwister talk 04:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets WP:GNG. Sources include: Rolling Stone, Indiegames (considered reliable per WP:VGRS), Hardcore Gamer (considered reliable per WP:VGRS). North America1000 08:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.