Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoppul Kodi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:Userfy to User:Filmreporter1/sandbox/Thoppul Kodi. (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 11:18, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thoppul Kodi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to indicate why this film should be considered notable. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 09:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:10, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:USERFY this new article back to author at User:Filmreporter1/sandbox/Thoppul Kodi for continued work. When proper coverage and sourcing have been included, and it can be shown to meet WP:NF we can allow it back. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:31, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- While we are in total agreement that the article currently fails notability, are you willing to let the editor continue work on his draft in a userspace? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've just reread WP:UNDELETE and WP:USERFY. I'd assumed/misremembered that deletion was normal before unification, but I see that it's not necessary. So changing vote to WP:USERFY Stuartyeates (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter (converse) 10:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After reading above, WP:USERFY seems the best thing here. Dontforgetthisone (talk) 00:15, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.