Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thongkholal Haokip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thongkholal Haokip[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article does not appear to meet WP:ACADEMIC, mainly because he is an assistant professor at Presidency University, having received his PhD in 2011. He is the editor of a journal that is barely two years old and he has only just published one book. Of course this person may become notable but that will most likely take some time. Green Giant (talk) 12:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:07, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Tiny cites. Editor of insignificant journal. Far too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. Most humanities academics publish at least one book so unless it has attracted an unusual level of attention that wouldn't be enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:23, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too soon. Nothing to add to the above !votes. --Randykitty (talk) 15:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.