Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomson Beattie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thomson Beattie[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG; very little coverage beyond being a victim of the Titanic. –dlthewave ☎ 03:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:16, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:16, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:16, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 12:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. W C M_email 22:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:Oneevent, no indication of any notability whatsoever apart from it; the implication that the person's sexual orientation might imply some notability is peculiarly unencyclopaedic. If the article is eventually kept, it will have to be completely rewritten from scratch as part of an open CCI. Assuming it is deleted, no objection to subsequent creation of a redirect to Passengers of the RMS Titanic. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think it's pretty clear from the sources themselves that this person does not have individual notability. If we have a longer article collecting Titanic passengers, some of this could live there. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.